These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

224 related items for PubMed ID: 28971727

  • 1. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities.
    Ching TYC, Zhang VW, Johnson EE, Van Buynder P, Hou S, Burns L, Button L, Flynn C, McGhie K.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S41-S54. PubMed ID: 28971727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
    McCreery RW, Bentler RA, Roush PA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Ching TY, Zhang VW, Flynn C, Burns L, Button L, Hou S, McGhie K, Van Buynder P.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.
    McCreery RW, Walker EA, Spratford M, Bentler R, Holte L, Roush P, Oleson J, Van Buren J, Moeller MP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 May; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):24S-37S. PubMed ID: 26731156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
    Johnson EE.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 May; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE, Dillon H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Impact of Hearing Aids on Language Outcomes in Preschool Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss.
    Hung YC, Ho PH, Chen PH, Tsai YS, Li YJ, Lin HC.
    Trends Hear; 2024 May; 28():23312165241256721. PubMed ID: 38773778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Typical consonant cluster acquisition in auditory-verbal children with early-identified severe/profound hearing loss.
    Fulcher A, Baker E, Purcell A, Munro N.
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 Feb; 16(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 24001172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Cupples L, Ching TY, Button L, Seeto M, Zhang V, Whitfield J, Gunnourie M, Martin L, Marnane V.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S55-S69. PubMed ID: 28899200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Learning from the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications.
    Ching TYC, Dillon H, Leigh G, Cupples L.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 29020839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fit-to-Targets and Aided Speech Intelligibility Index Values for Hearing Aids Fitted to the DSL v5-Adult Prescription.
    Dao A, Folkeard P, Baker S, Pumford J, Scollie S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):90-98. PubMed ID: 33296929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK, Umat C, Chew YY.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P, Bagatto M, Scollie S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
    Portelli D, Loteta S, Ciodaro F, Salvago P, Galletti C, Freni L, Alberti G.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.