These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


729 related items for PubMed ID: 28972469

  • 1. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M, McLean HH, McCreery R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.
    Lewis D, Kopun J, McCreery R, Brennan M, Nishi K, Cordrey E, Stelmachowicz P, Moeller MP.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Oct; 38(3):e180-e192. PubMed ID: 28045838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children: Effects of Auditory Access, Age, and Semantic Context.
    Walker EA, Kessler D, Klein K, Spratford M, Oleson JJ, Welhaven A, McCreery RW.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul 15; 62(7):2519-2534. PubMed ID: 31194921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr 15; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing.
    Lalonde K, Walker EA, Leibold LJ, McCreery RW.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr 15; 45(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 37415268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of Extended-Wear Hearing Technology for Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J, Schafer E, Martella N, Morais M, Mann M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr 15; 26(7):615-31. PubMed ID: 26218051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A, Wolfe J, Scollie S, Schafer E, Hudson M, Woods W, Wheeler J, Hudgens K, Neumann S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr 15; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.
    McCreery RW, Stelmachowicz PG.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 15; 34(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 23446226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hearing Thresholds, Speech Recognition, and Audibility as Indicators for Modifying Intervention in Children With Hearing Aids.
    Wiseman KB, McCreery RW, Walker EA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 15; 44(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 36627755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
    Krull V, Choi S, Kirk KI, Prusick L, French B.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb 15; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF, Koenig LL.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb 15; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS, Fausel N, Liskow C, Chobot J.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb 15; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aided Hearing Moderates the Academic Outcomes of Children With Mild to Severe Hearing Loss.
    Tomblin JB, Oleson J, Ambrose SE, Walker EA, McCreery RW, Moeller MP.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Feb 15; 41(4):775-789. PubMed ID: 32032223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The role of sentence position, allomorph, and morpheme type on accurate use of s-related morphemes by children who are hard of hearing.
    Koehlinger K, Van Horne AO, Oleson J, McCreery R, Moeller MP.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr 15; 58(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 25650750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM, Browning J, Buss E, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Apr 15; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr 15; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 15; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Segmental and Suprasegmental Perception in Children Using Hearing Aids.
    Wenrich KA, Davidson LS, Uchanski RM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr 15; 28(10):901-912. PubMed ID: 29130438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr 15; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Can Closed-Set Word Recognition Differentially Assess Vowel and Consonant Perception for School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss?
    Buss E, Felder J, Miller MK, Leibold LJ, Calandruccio L.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct 17; 65(10):3934-3950. PubMed ID: 36194777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.