These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

583 related items for PubMed ID: 28974230

  • 1. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe T, Debrock S.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct 03; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe T, Debrock S.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 Jul 30; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 27475526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Haentjens P, Blockeel C, Tournaye H, Verheyen G.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov 30; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Fernandez Gallardo E, De Neubourg D, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe TM.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug 30; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY, Xue YM, Yang LY, Jiang LY, Ling C, Tong XM, Zhang SY.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep 30; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C, Sermondade N, Dupont C, Poncelet C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, Benzacken B, Levy R.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar 30; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
    Yu L, Jia C, Lan Y, Song R, Zhou L, Li Y, Liang Y, Wang S.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct 30; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning on the implantation rate per embryo in frozen/vitrified-thawed/warmed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Spiessens C, Willemen D, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug 30; 26(8):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 21659315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
    Kahraman S, Candan ZN.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov 30; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Sun XX.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug 30; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec 30; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of two different thaw protocols on outcomes of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos transfer.
    Zhang XJ, Yang YZ, Lv Q, Wang Y, Cao XH, Li XJ, Liao MX, Guo C.
    Cryo Letters; 2012 Dec 30; 33(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 23250400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
    Levron J, Leibovitz O, Brengauz M, Gitman H, Yerushalmi GM, Katorza E, Gat I, Elizur SE.
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar 30; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N, Kananen K, Huhtala H, Keränen S, Tinkanen H.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar 30; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A monocentric analysis of the efficacy of extracellular cryoprotectants in unfrozen solutions for cleavage stage embryos.
    Capodanno F, Daolio J, De Feo G, Falbo A, Morini D, Nicoli A, Braglia L, Villani M, La Sala GB, Parmegiani L, Aguzzoli L.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Oct 27; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 31656205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O, Scalici E, Hoa-Ferrieres A, Deutsch-Bringer S, Gala A, Dechaud H, Hamamah S.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar 27; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Mitochondrial bioenergetic profiles of warmed bovine blastocysts are typically altered after cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification.
    Kurzella J, Miskel D, Rings F, Tholen E, Tesfaye D, Schellander K, Salilew-Wondim D, Held-Hoelker E, Große-Brinkhaus C, Hoelker M.
    Theriogenology; 2024 Jan 15; 214():21-32. PubMed ID: 37839094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cryopreservation method affects DNA fragmentation in trophectoderm and the speed of re-expansion in bovine blastocysts.
    Inaba Y, Miyashita S, Somfai T, Geshi M, Matoba S, Dochi O, Nagai T.
    Cryobiology; 2016 Apr 15; 72(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 26996887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Contribution of embryo vitrification procedure to ART efficiency].
    Sifer C.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct 15; 42(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 25192924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Minimum volume Spatula MVD vitrification method improves embryo survival compared to traditional slow freezing, both for in vivo and in vitro produced mice embryos.
    Meikle MN, Schlapp G, Menchaca A, Crispo M.
    Cryobiology; 2018 Oct 15; 84():77-81. PubMed ID: 30040919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.