These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1161 related items for PubMed ID: 29031513

  • 1. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ, Agrawal R, Samuel S, Wang Y, Zilberstein S, Fisher DL.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities.
    Hajiseyedjavadi F, Zhang T, Agrawal R, Knodler M, Fisher D, Samuel S.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():41-52. PubMed ID: 29277384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A, Victor T, Dozza M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T, Kühn M, Hummel T, Vollrath M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S, Neyens DM.
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A, Horrey WJ, Liang Y, Garabet A, Simmons L, Fisher DL.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.
    Pipkorn L, Dozza M, Tivesten E.
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K, Stemmler E, Schießl C, Jipp M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Post Take-Over Performance Varies in Drivers of Automated and Connected Vehicle Technology in Near-Miss Scenarios.
    Yamani Y, Glassman J, Alruwaili A, Yahoodik SE, Davis E, Lugo S, Xie K, Ishak S.
    Hum Factors; 2024 Nov; 66(11):2503-2517. PubMed ID: 38052019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q, Li S, Ma X, Lu G.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R, Louw T, Merat N.
    PLoS One; 2018 Aug; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K, Buchner A, Schrauf M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.
    Zach Noonan T, Gershon P, Domeyer J, Mehler B, Reimer B.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107236. PubMed ID: 37531855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D, DeGuzman CA, Donmez B.
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D, Kanaan D, Donmez B.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S, Brandenburg S, Thüring M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C, Louw TL, Merat N, Li P, Hu M, Li Y.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X, Zhang Y.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 59.