These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

371 related items for PubMed ID: 29034562

  • 1. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR® , optical coherence tomography (Optovue iVue® ), and high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Wolfel AE, Pederson SL, Cleymaet AM, Hess AM, Freeman KS.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between Pentacam-HR and optical coherence tomographycentral corneal thickness measurements in healthy feline eyes.
    Cleymaet AM, Hess AM, Freeman KS.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():105-14. PubMed ID: 27370363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and digital caliper in frozen canine corneas.
    Jeong S, Kang S, Park S, Park E, Lim J, Nam T, Seo K.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):339-346. PubMed ID: 29111598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of iridocorneal angle parameters measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in dogs.
    Shim J, Kang S, Jeong Y, Lee E, Jeong D, Seo K.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 25 Suppl 1():103-110. PubMed ID: 34784106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thickness measurements with scanning-slit, Scheimpflug and Fourier-domain ocular coherence tomography.
    Randleman JB, Lynn MJ, Perez-Straziota CE, Weissman HM, Kim SW.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 25824260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology.
    Ozyol E, Özyol P.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 65(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 28643709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of internal anterior chamber diameter imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy, Visante optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam.
    Kim SK, Kim HM, Song JS.
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 20163076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
    Jahadi Hosseini HR, Katbab A, Khalili MR, Abtahi MB.
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
    Vollmer L, Sowka J, Pizzimenti J, Yu X.
    Optometry; 2012 May 31; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.