These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 29036136

  • 1. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
    Fülep C, Kovács I, Kránitz K, Erdei G.
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul 01; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP, Bach M.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep 01; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH, Formankiewicz MA, Waugh SJ.
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr 01; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Different trajectories in the development of visual acuity with different levels of crowding: The Milan Eye Chart (MEC).
    Facchin A, Maffioletti S, Martelli M, Daini R.
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar 01; 156():10-16. PubMed ID: 30639454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.
    Arditi A, Cagenello R.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan 01; 34(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 8425819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N, Dakin SC, Whitaker HL, Anderson RS.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar 06; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM, Yeoman JP, Anstice N, Dakin SC.
    J Vis; 2018 Mar 01; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W, Rassow B, Wesemann W, Saur K, Hilz R.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan 01; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan 01; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.
    Lueder GT, Garibaldi D.
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov 01; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.
    Mocan MC, Najera-Covarrubias M, Wright KW.
    J AAPOS; 2005 Feb 01; 9(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15729280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N, Jacobs RJ, Sloan R, Denny S, Shea K, Thompson B, Anstice N.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul 01; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Handy Eye Check: a mobile medical application to test visual acuity in children.
    Toner KN, Lynn MJ, Candy TR, Hutchinson AK.
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun 01; 18(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 24924280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG, Tarita-Nistor L, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct 01; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relative legibility and confusions of letter acuity targets in the peripheral and central retina.
    Reich LN, Bedell HE.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May 01; 77(5):270-5. PubMed ID: 10831217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity.
    Watson AB, Ahumada AJ.
    J Vis; 2012 Sep 29; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Danish version of the Radner Reading Chart: design and empirical testing of sentence optotypes in subjects of varying educational background.
    Munch IC, Jørgensen AH, Radner W.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar 29; 94(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 26408429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B, Wang Y.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug 29; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N, Dakin SC, Anderson RS.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct 09; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new optotype chart for detection of nonorganic visual loss.
    Mojon DS, Flueckiger P.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr 09; 109(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 11927447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.