These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 29037181

  • 1. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Odijk R, Hennipman B, Rousian M, Madani K, Dijksterhuis M, de Leeuw JW, van Hof A.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct 16; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct 16; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast ® and Vicryl rapide ® polyglactin 910 fast absorbing sutures on maternal morbidity experienced by women following episiotomy repair: a single-blind, randomized study.
    Hemalatha Devi D, Bolanthakodi C, D'Cunha P, Bheema Bai M, Kumar Moharana A, Ts D.
    F1000Res; 2022 Oct 16; 11():1179. PubMed ID: 37388624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Buresch AM, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, Sahasrabudhe N, Sun M, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS, Ngai IM, Garry DJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep 16; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.
    Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M.
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Sep 16; 39(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 9326705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.
    Kokanalı D, Ugur M, Kuntay Kokanalı M, Karayalcın R, Tonguc E.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug 16; 284(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 20680312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.
    Gartti-Jardim EC, de Souza AP, Carvalho AC, Pereira CC, Okamoto R, Magro Filho O.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec 16; 17(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23269361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
    Bariol SV, Stewart GD, Tolley DA.
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov 16; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].
    Marty N, Verspyck E.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec 16; 46(12):948-967. PubMed ID: 30392991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
    Homvises B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug 16; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.
    Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr 16; 105(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9609273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R, Van Rijssel EJ.
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May 16; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
    El-Din AS, Kamal MM, Amin MA.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul 16; 40(7):1877-82. PubMed ID: 25056465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Episiotomy techniques].
    Verspyck E, Sentilhes L, Roman H, Sergent F, Marpeau L.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb 16; 35(1 Suppl):1S40-1S51. PubMed ID: 16495826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of cosmetic outcomes of lacerations on the extremities and trunk using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures.
    Tejani C, Sivitz AB, Rosen MD, Nakanishi AK, Flood RG, Clott MA, Saccone PG, Luck RP.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun 16; 21(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 25039547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.