These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1220 related items for PubMed ID: 29065734

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H, Guo J, Wang K, Zhu H, Chen J, Xu C, Wang D, Jin Z.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan 29; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH.
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec 29; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge Versus 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles.
    Siddique DA, Rahal MA, Trevino K, Wu HH, Al-Haddad MA.
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct 29; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec 29; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, Bingham R, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Gomez V, Wallace MB.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec 29; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P, Nassar A, Gomez V, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Crook JE, Fares NS, Wallace MB.
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr 29; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 61.