These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

260 related items for PubMed ID: 29068860

  • 1. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S, Frenken M, Bentz L, Ortmann M, Walger M, Meister H.
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A, Berthommier F, Leybaert J.
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N, Sommers MS, Spehar B.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
    Tye-Murray N, Sommers M, Spehar B, Myerson J, Hale S.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D, Bazo D.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jul; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.
    Waddington E, Jaekel BN, Tinnemore AR, Gordon-Salant S, Goupell MJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jul; 41(5):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 32069269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.
    Lachs L, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):236-51. PubMed ID: 11409859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Dorman MF, Liss J, Wang S, Berisha V, Ludwig C, Natale SC.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec 01; 59(6):1505-1519. PubMed ID: 27960006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JG.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Dec 01; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Moberly AC, Pisoni DB, Tamati TN.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Dec 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Functional localization of audiovisual speech using near infrared spectroscopy.
    Butera IM, Larson ED, DeFreese AJ, Lee AK, Gifford RH, Wallace MT.
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jul 01; 35(4):416-430. PubMed ID: 35821542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
    Layer N, Weglage A, Müller V, Meister H, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Murray MM, Sandmann P.
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022 Jul 01; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ, Lee HJ, Kang H, Lee DS, Chang SO, Oh SH.
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar 01; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise.
    MacLeod A, Summerfield Q.
    Br J Audiol; 1987 May 01; 21(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 3594015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Effects of Preoperative Audiovisual Speech Perception on the Audiologic Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Postlingual Deafness.
    Lee HJ, Lee JM, Choi JY, Jung J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021 May 01; 26(3):149-156. PubMed ID: 33352550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Barone P.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan 10; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.