These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

352 related items for PubMed ID: 29076926

  • 1. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
    Lassaletta L, Polak M, Huesers J, Díaz-Gómez M, Calvino M, Varela-Nieto I, Gavilán J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A, O'Driscoll M, Stapleton E, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Munro KJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N, Hoen M, Truy E, Gallego S.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jan; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracochlear Test Electrode for Acoustic Nerve Monitoring in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery.
    Medina MM, Polo R, Amilibia E, Roca-Ribas F, Díaz M, Pérez M, Muriel A, Gavilán J, Cobeta I, Lassaletta L.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jan; 41(6):1648-1659. PubMed ID: 33136639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
    Wang Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Shen X, Han S, Wang W, Gao F, Liang W, Peng KA.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus And N, Reeder RM.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Bacciu S.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A, Wang Z, Cui Y, Zhou L, Chi F.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. EABR measurements during cochlear implantation in one-year-old, infant, child, adult, and elderly patients.
    Enomoto C, Minami S, Kaga K.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 141(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 33146057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wei CG, Wang Y, Li H.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov 07; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Morgon A.
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr 07; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS, Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec 07; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response-based evaluation of the spatial distribution of auditory neuronal tissue in common cavity deformities.
    Yamazaki H, Naito Y, Fujiwara K, Moroto S, Yamamoto R, Yamazaki T, Sasaki I.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep 07; 35(8):1394-402. PubMed ID: 24770408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB, Chambers And RD, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec 07; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.