These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
167 related items for PubMed ID: 29082642
1. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Haemonetics and Trima Accel Cell Separators. Keklik M, Keklik E, Kalan U, Ozer O, Arik F, Sarikoc M. Ther Apher Dial; 2018 Feb; 22(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 29082642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the Trima Accel cell separator in the double dose plateletpheresis. Keklik M, Korkmaz S, Kalan U, Sarikoc M, Keklik E. Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Oct; 55(2):240-242. PubMed ID: 27522105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators. Keklik M, Eser B, Kaynar L, Solmaz M, Ozturk A, Yay M, Birekul A, Oztekin M, Sivgin S, Cetin M, Unal A. Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators. Keklik M, Eser B, Kaynar L, Sivgin S, Keklik E, Solmaz M, Ozturk A, Buyukoglan R, Yay M, Cetin M, Unal A. J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics® MCS® plus and Trima Accel®. Baruah S, Bajpai M. Asian J Transfus Sci; 2020 Jun; 14(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 33162701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of the haemonetics MCS cell separator in the collection of apheresis platelets. Keklik M, Keklik E, Korkmaz S, Aygun B, Arik F, Kilic O, Sarikoc M. Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Dec; 53(3):396-8. PubMed ID: 26283175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of five plateletpheresis machines in a tertiary care center of India: AmiCORE vs COM.TEC vs Haemonetics MCS+ vs Spectra Optia vs Trima Accel. Arcot PJ, Kumar K, Coshic P, Andriyas V, Mehta V. J Clin Apher; 2021 Feb; 36(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 32894894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators. Fontana S, Mordasini L, Keller P, Taleghani BM. Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):2004-10. PubMed ID: 17076857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of high-dose plateletpheresis with the latest apheresis systems on the same donors. Picker SM, Radojska SM, Gathof BS. Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1601-8. PubMed ID: 16965590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plateletpheresis efficiency and mathematical correction of software-derived platelet yield prediction: A linear regression and ROC modeling approach. Jaime-Pérez JC, Jiménez-Castillo RA, Vázquez-Hernández KE, Salazar-Riojas R, Méndez-Ramírez N, Gómez-Almaguer D. J Clin Apher; 2017 Oct; 32(5):329-334. PubMed ID: 27862253 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality validation of platelets obtained from the Haemonetics and Trima Accel automated blood-collection systems. Wang HH, Liao LN, Lin CL, Yen LL, Hsiao YM, Ko JL. Transfus Clin Biol; 2021 Feb; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 33227455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the automated collection and extended storage of apheresis platelets in additive solution. Johnson L, Winter KM, Hartkopf-Theis T, Reid S, Kwok M, Marks DC. Transfusion; 2012 Mar; 52(3):503-9. PubMed ID: 21880041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions. Eder AF, Dy BA, DeMerse B, Wagner SJ, Stramer SL, O'Neill EM, Herron RM. Transfusion; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2969-2976. PubMed ID: 28880363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]