These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length. Whitehouse RW. Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microradiography of the collecting ducts in the perfusion fixed rabbit kidney: suggestions for the anatomic basis for the radiographic appearance of cortical striations and intrarenal reflux. Gade R, Gade MF. Invest Radiol; 1978 Jul; 13(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 689825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 2. Changes in visualization by DIP]. Ikeuchi T, Hamashima T, Sakamoto M. Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 2343807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography]. Sugaya K, Nishizawa O, Noto H, Suzuki T, Shimoda N, Miyagata S, Harada T, Tsuchida S. Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of iohexol and diatrizoate on pulmonary arterial pressure following pulmonary angiography. A clinical comparison in man. Tajima H, Kumazaki T, Tajima N, Ebata K. Acta Radiol; 1988 Mar; 29(4):487-90. PubMed ID: 3408612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental study. Stordahl A. J Oslo City Hosp; 1989 Jun; 39(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 2649649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]