These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 29102601

  • 1. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia.
    Al-Mahalawy H, Abuohashish H, Chathoth S, Al-Masoud N, Al-Jandan B.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
    Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG.
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW, Ahmed AM.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Buccal injection of articaine to anesthetize the palatal mucosa.
    Abu Sharkh M, Khalil A, Ong-Ly C, Wilson TD, Galil K.
    Gen Dent; 2019 Apr; 67(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 31199741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
    Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
    Luqman U, Majeed Janjua OS, Ashfaq M, Irfan H, Mushtaq S, Bilal A.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions.
    Lima-Júnior JL, Dias-Ribeiro E, de Araújo TN, Ferreira-Rocha J, Honfi-Júnior ES, Sarmento CF, Seabra FR, de Sousa Mdo S.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Mar 01; 14(3):E129-32. PubMed ID: 19242392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
    Fan S, Chen WL, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar 01; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
    Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS, Padmini G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan 01; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?
    Uckan S, Dayangac E, Araz K.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec 01; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Beck M.
    J Endod; 2014 Dec 01; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
    Gholami M, Banihashemrad A, Mohammadzadeh A, Ahrari F.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug 01; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
    Rayati F, Haeri M, Norouziha A, Jabbarian R.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul 01; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
    Rathi NV, Khatri AA, Agrawal AG, M SB, Thosar NR, Deolia SG.
    Anesth Prog; 2019 Jul 01; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
    Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG.
    J Endod; 2006 Apr 01; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.