These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies. Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I. Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage. Lee HJ, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK. Angle Orthod; 2022 May 01; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E. Prog Orthod; 2015 May 01; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Long-Term Use of Facemask With Miniplate on Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. On SW, Baek SH, Choi JY. J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar 01; 29(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 29135737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion. Ellis E, McNamara JA. Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct 01; 86(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 6592976 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. de Lir Ade L, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun 01; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask. Nevzatoğlu S, Küçükkeleş N. Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov 01; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]