These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 2915869

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
    Henig I, Chan P, Tredway DR, Maw GM, Gullett AJ, Cheatwood M.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
    Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Histopathologic adequacy of office endometrial biopsies taken with the Z-sampler and Novak curette in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
    Larson DM, Broste SK.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 8040848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
    Manganiello PD, Burrows LJ, Dain BJ, Gonzalez J.
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy.
    Stovall TG, Solomon SK, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 2915864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Yang GC, Wan LS.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A prospective, randomized comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Novak curette.
    Stovall TG, Ling FW, Morgan PL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 165(5 Pt 1):1287-90. PubMed ID: 1957847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S, Triratanachat S, Kankeow K, Limpaphayom KK.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Diagnosis of basal body temperature, serum progesterone and endometrial biopsy for luteal phase defect].
    He H.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Feb; 28(2):82-4, 122-3. PubMed ID: 8344087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.