These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 29161982

  • 21. Directional benefit in the presence of speech and speechlike maskers.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jan; 18(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 17252955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Differences in a Musician's Advantage for Speech-in-Speech Perception Based on Age and Task.
    Cohn M, Barreda S, Zellou G.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb 13; 66(2):545-564. PubMed ID: 36729698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec 13; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May 13; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects with an energetic or informational masker in bilateral and bimodal CI users.
    Pyschny V, Landwehr M, Hahn M, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Meister H.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct 13; 57(5):1942-60. PubMed ID: 24825129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, Roverud E, Swaminathan J, Jennings T, Clayton K, Steven Colburn H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan 13; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The Effect of Musical Training and Working Memory in Adverse Listening Situations.
    Escobar J, Mussoi BS, Silberer AB.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jan 13; 41(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 32106117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH, Guo YJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug 03; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking. German version].
    Rählmann S, Meister H.
    HNO; 2017 Mar 03; 65(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 28054098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.
    Zendel BR, Tremblay CD, Belleville S, Peretz I.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May 03; 27(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 25390195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K, Sharma M, Ibrahim RK, Mandikal Vasuki PR.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan 03; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M, Dillon H.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep 03; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.
    Madsen SMK, Whiteford KL, Oxenham AJ.
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct 03; 7(1):12624. PubMed ID: 28974705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effects of auditory spatial training on informational masking release in elderly listeners: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
    Jarollahi F, Amiri M, Jalaie S, Sameni SJ.
    F1000Res; 2019 Oct 03; 8():420. PubMed ID: 31354946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Informational Masking Effects of Speech Versus Nonspeech Noise on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Vander Werff KR, Niemczak CE, Morse K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct 04; 64(10):4014-4029. PubMed ID: 34464537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 04; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.