These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf. Lee SA, Chang CCH, Roberts WE. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis. Pancherz H, Bjerklin K, Lindskog-Stokland B, Hansen K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment. Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 283705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample. Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Ursi W. Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Lima KJ, Henriques JF, Janson G, Pereira SC, Neves LS, Cançado RH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I. Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns. Deen E, Woods MG. Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report. Shah AH. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 May; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]