These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

381 related items for PubMed ID: 29169315

  • 21. Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.
    Buss E, Hodge SE, Calandruccio L, Leibold LJ, Grose JH.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30601213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J, Wang X, Wang NY, Fu X, Gan T, Galvin JJ, Willis S, Xu K, Thomas M, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug 10; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE, Bonino AY, Buss E, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Aug 10; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr 24; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Swaminathan J, Roverud E, Clayton KK, Best V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul 24; 140(1):132. PubMed ID: 27475139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.
    Calandruccio L, Brouwer S, Van Engen KJ, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun 24; 22(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 23800811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
    Chen J, Li H, Li L, Wu X, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr 24; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr 24; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Does visual speech provide release from perceptual masking in children?
    Halverson DM, Lalonde K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep 24; 148(3):EL221. PubMed ID: 33003896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 24; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD, Corbin NE, Buss E, Monson BB.
    Ear Hear; 2022 Aug 24; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.
    Williams BT, Viswanathan N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct 24; 148(4):2006. PubMed ID: 33138488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E, Calandruccio L, Oleson J, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Oct 24; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr 24; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of Second Language Proficiency and Linguistic Uncertainty on Recognition of Speech in Native and Nonnative Competing Speech.
    Francis AL, Tigchelaar LJ, Zhang R, Zekveld AA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul 13; 61(7):1815-1830. PubMed ID: 29971338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
    Carlile S, Corkhill C.
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar 02; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr 02; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.
    Wightman FL, Kistler DJ, O'Bryan A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul 02; 128(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 20649222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov 02; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.