These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
307 related items for PubMed ID: 29172065
1. DNA methylation markers in combination with skeletal and dental ages to improve age estimation in children. Shi L, Jiang F, Ouyang F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Shen X. Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():1-9. PubMed ID: 29172065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental age assessment in 7-14-year-old Chinese children: comparison of Demirjian and Willems methods. Ye X, Jiang F, Sheng X, Huang H, Shen X. Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():36-41. PubMed ID: 25195126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Age estimation combining radiographic information of two dental and four skeletal predictors in children and subadults. Kumagai A, Willems G, Franco A, Thevissen P. Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1769-1777. PubMed ID: 30099588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an AI-Powered Automated X-ray Bone Age Analyzer in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Comparison with the Tanner-Whitehouse 3 Method. Liang Y, Chen X, Zheng R, Cheng X, Su Z, Wang X, Du H, Zhu M, Li G, Zhong Y, Cheng S, Yu B, Yang Y, Chen R, Cui L, Yao H, Gu Q, Gong C, Jun Z, Huang X, Liu D, Yan X, Wei H, Li Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Wang F, Zhang G, Fan X, Dai H, Luo X. Adv Ther; 2024 Sep; 41(9):3664-3677. PubMed ID: 39085749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of developing teeth, and carpals and epiphyses of the ulna and radius for assessing new cut-offs at the age thresholds of 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 years. Cameriere R, De Luca S, Cingolani M, Ferrante L. J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():50-4. PubMed ID: 26165659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reference values of differences between TW3-C RUS and TW3-C Carpal bone ages of children from five cities of China]. Zhang SY, Liu LJ, Han YS, Liu G, Ma ZG, Shen XZ, Xu RL, Hua JQ. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 46(11):851-5. PubMed ID: 19099904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental age estimation with fewer than mandibular seven teeth: An accuracy study of Bedek models in Turkish children. Çarıkçıoğlu B, Sezer B. Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5773-5784. PubMed ID: 35562511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dental age assessment in a northern Chinese population. Zhai Y, Park H, Han J, Wang H, Ji F, Tao J. J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Feb; 38():43-9. PubMed ID: 26706412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified dental age assessment method for 5- to 16-year-old eastern Chinese children. Pan J, Shen C, Yang Z, Fan L, Wang M, Shen S, Tao J, Ji F. Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3463-3474. PubMed ID: 33420828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the accuracy of Willems' and Cameriere's methods based on panoramic radiography. Ozveren N, Serindere G, Meric P, Cameriere R. Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109912. PubMed ID: 31408787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of three age estimation methods based on dental and skeletal development in a sample of young Brazilians. Machado MA, Daruge Júnior E, Fernandes MM, Lima IFP, Cericato GO, Franco A, Paranhos LR. Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jan; 85():166-171. PubMed ID: 29100105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the Demirjian, Willems and Nolla methods for dental age estimation in a northern Chinese population. Han MQ, Jia SX, Wang CX, Chu G, Chen T, Zhou H, Guo YC. Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Oct; 118():104875. PubMed ID: 32795622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]