These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

704 related items for PubMed ID: 29178721

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Post-gel and Total Shrinkage Stress of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin Composites in Endodontically-treated Molars.
    da Silva Pereira RA, de Bragança GF, Vilela A, de Deus RA, Miranda RR, Veríssimo C, Soares CJ.
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep 01; 45(5):E217-E226. PubMed ID: 32352352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A, Mühlebach S, Lussi A, Flury S.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Sep 01; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N, Hickel R.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr 01; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of occlusal loading and mechanical properties of resin composite on stress generated in posterior restorations.
    Bicalho AA, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ.
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 27(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 25208359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
    Rullman I, Patyna M, Janssen B, Willershausen B.
    Am J Dent; 2017 Feb 01; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH, Park SH.
    Oper Dent; 2017 Feb 01; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
    Oliveira LRS, Braga SSL, Bicalho AA, Ribeiro MTH, Price RB, Soares CJ.
    J Dent; 2018 Jul 01; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC, Oliveira LRS, Braga SSL, Soares CJ, Versluis A, Borges GA, Veríssimo C.
    J Adhes Dent; 2020 Jul 01; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA, de Souza SJ, de Rosatto CM, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec 01; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of Restorative Protocol on Cuspal Strain and Residual Stress in Endodontically Treated Molars.
    Pereira R, Bicalho AA, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ.
    Oper Dent; 2016 Dec 01; 41(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26237644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
    Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G.
    J Dent; 2014 Aug 01; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul 01; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.
    Rizzante FAP, Mondelli RFL, Furuse AY, Borges AFS, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan 07; 27():e20180132. PubMed ID: 30624465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites.
    Kim RJ, Kim YJ, Choi NS, Lee IB.
    J Dent; 2015 Apr 07; 43(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 25676178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?
    Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar 07; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar 07; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
    Campodonico CE, Tantbirojn D, Olin PS, Versluis A.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct 07; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities.
    Kumagai RY, Zeidan LC, Rodrigues JA, Reis AF, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug 07; 17(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 26525007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.