These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

569 related items for PubMed ID: 29178849

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F, Huang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Deng M, Li L, Yu A, Wang Q, Elsheikh A.
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD, Atalay E, Sözer Ö, Gürsoy H, Bilgin M, Yıldırım N.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements.
    AlMubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Nov; 91(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 18651843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T, Knappe M, Moros I.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
    Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 243(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 15756572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
    Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry versus non-contact tonometry in eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil.
    Pagoulatos DD, Kapsala ZG, Makri OE, Georgalas IG, Georgakopoulos CD.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 30(3):494-499. PubMed ID: 30832494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.