These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 29183184

  • 1. Third trimester ultrasound for fetal macrosomia: optimal timing and institutional specific accuracy.
    Parikh LI, Iqbal SN, Jelin AC, Overcash RT, Tefera E, Fries MH.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(8):1337-1341. PubMed ID: 29183184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000 Aug; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Measurement and evaluation of fetal fat layer in the prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.
    Elessawy M, Harders C, Kleinwechter H, Demandt N, Sheasha GA, Maass N, Pecks U, Eckmann-Scholz C.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):445-453. PubMed ID: 28631075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies using the gestation-adjusted projection method: comparison of two timing strategies for third-trimester sonography.
    Moore GS, Post AL, West NA, Hart JE, Lynch AM.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jun; 34(6):971-5. PubMed ID: 26014315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.
    Banks CL, Nelson SM, Owen P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17897772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW.
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
    Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Mashiach R, Meizner I, Yogev Y.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.