These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

86 related items for PubMed ID: 2918688

  • 1. Evaluation of dust respirators for elimination of mouse aeroallergens.
    Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Miyazawa H, Kamimura H, Kimura M, Yamazaki S.
    Lab Anim Sci; 1989 Jan; 39(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 2918688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Particle size of airborne mouse crude and defined allergens.
    Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Miyazawa H, Kamimura H, Kimura M, Yamazaki S.
    Lab Anim Sci; 1989 May; 39(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 2724924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of countermeasures for reduction of mouse airborne allergens.
    Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Miyazawa H, Kamimura H, Kimura M, Yamazaki S.
    Lab Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 40(6):613-5. PubMed ID: 2172625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Exposure of laboratory animal workers to airborne rat and mouse urinary allergens.
    Hollander A, Van Run P, Spithoven J, Heederik D, Doekes G.
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1997 Jun; 27(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 9208181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Detection of mite allergens in the dust of filter-net and air of air-conditioned room].
    Lian YY, Liu ZG, Wang HY, Chai CY, Liu XY.
    Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 25(4):325-7, 332. PubMed ID: 18038805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The efficiency of protective hoods used by sandblasters to reduce silica dust exposure.
    Samimi B, Neilson A, Weill H, Ziskind M.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Feb; 36(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 167570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Can the use of HEPA cleaners in homes of asthmatic children and adolescents sensitized to cat and dog allergens decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness and allergen contents in solid dust?
    Sulser C, Schulz G, Wagner P, Sommerfeld C, Keil T, Reich A, Wahn U, Lau S.
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2009 Feb; 148(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18716400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
    Balazy A, Toivola M, Reponen T, Podgórski A, Zimmer A, Grinshpun SA.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Characteristics of farmers who have obtained personal dust respirators.
    Virolainen R, Tupi K, Terho EO, Husman K, Notkola V, Vohlonen I.
    Eur J Respir Dis Suppl; 1987 Apr; 152():199-205. PubMed ID: 3478218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Partial protection by respirators on airways responses following exposure in a swine house.
    Palmberg L, Larsson BM, Sundblad BM, Larsson K.
    Am J Ind Med; 2004 Oct; 46(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 15376212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of a radioallergosorbent (RAST) inhibition method and a monoclonal enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for aeroallergen measurement.
    Renström A, Gordon S, Larsson PH, Tee RD, Newman Taylor AJ, Malmberg P.
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1997 Nov; 27(11):1314-21. PubMed ID: 9420136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
    Lee SA, Grinshpun SA, Adhikari A, Li W, McKay R, Maynard A, Reponen T.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Detection and quantification of pharaoh ant antigens in household dust samples as newly identified aeroallergens.
    Kim CW, Song JS, Choi SY, Park JW, Hong CS.
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2007 Apr; 144(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 17587860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Breathing resistance of dust respirators.
    Andrew E.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):B14, B16. PubMed ID: 4061283
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens.
    Gordon S, Fisher SW, Raymond RH.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 Aug; 108(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 11496249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG, Lawrence RB, Slaven JE, Coffey CC.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of exposure to mite allergens; flotation, ELISA and Acarex comparative study.
    Kalpakhoğlu AF, Misirhigil Z, Gübrüz L, Demirel YS.
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1996 Jun; 24(6):248-53. PubMed ID: 9010560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Problems in improving and standardizing anti-dust respirators].
    Bykhovskaia IA.
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1980 Apr; (4):45-7. PubMed ID: 7409558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A study on the usage of respirators among granite quarry workers in Singapore.
    Chia SE.
    Singapore Med J; 1989 Jun; 30(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 2555925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of two dust collection methods for reservoir indoor allergens and endotoxin on carpets and mattresses.
    Wickens K, Lane J, Siebers R, Ingham T, Crane J.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Jun; 14(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15104790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.