These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


181 related items for PubMed ID: 29191609

  • 1. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A, Häussling T, Rehmann P, Schaaf H, Wöstmann B.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of implant system, impression technique, and impression material on accuracy of the working cast.
    Wegner K, Weskott K, Zenginel M, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(4):989-95. PubMed ID: 23869356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
    Rutkunas V, Sveikata K, Savickas R.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug 01; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A.
    J Dent; 2014 Dec 01; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec 01; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants.
    Baldissara P, Koci B, Messias AM, Meneghello R, Ghelli F, Gatto MR, Ciocca L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec 01; 126(6):763-771. PubMed ID: 33526247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-dimensional accuracy of plastic transfer impression copings for three implant systems.
    Teo JW, Tan KB, Nicholls JI, Wong KM, Uy J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014 Dec 01; 29(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 24818195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative Study of Dimensional Accuracy in Three Dental Implant Impression Techniques: Open Tray, Closed Tray with Impression Coping, and Snap Cap.
    Izadi A, Heidari B, Roshanaei G, Allahbakhshi H, Fotovat F.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):974-981. PubMed ID: 30150500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.