These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. How good is the estimated cover test at predicting the von Graefe phoria measurement? Calvin H, Rupnow P, Grosvenor T. Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 73(11):701-6. PubMed ID: 8950752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The repeatability and reproducibility of four techniques for measuring horizontal heterophoria: Implications for clinical practice. Anstice NS, Davidson B, Field B, Mathan J, Collins AV, Black JM. J Optom; 2021 Nov; 14(3):275-281. PubMed ID: 32798131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests. Wong EP, Fricke TR, Dinardo C. Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 12086303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Strabometry precision: intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in measuring the magnitude of the angle of latent binocular ocular deviations (heterophorias or latent strabismus). Antona B, Gonzalez E, Barrio A, Barra F, Sanchez I, Cebrian JL. Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2011 Jun; 26(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 21736550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of heterophoria measurements on subsequent associated phoria measurement in a refractive routine. Brautaset RL, Jennings JA. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jul; 19(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 10645391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]