These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 2920487

  • 21. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY, Gallarno RM.
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Child welfare services for the catastrophically ill newborn: Part II--A guiding ethical paradigm.
    Hughes RC.
    Child Welfare; 1993 Sep; 72(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 8404247
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
    Crossley M.
    Issues Law Med; 1996 Sep; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB.
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Neonatal ethical dilemmas examined.
    Brodeur D.
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1994 Jan; 9(6):1-5, 8. PubMed ID: 11652838
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC.
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Human rights and the omission or cessation of treatment for infants.
    Goldworth A.
    J Perinatol; 1989 Mar; 9(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 2709156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ.
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS, Barthel R.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Baby Jane Doe's right of privacy from cradle to grave: infirmities of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendment.
    Baughman LK.
    Med Law; 1987 May; 6(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 3657404
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.