These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

313 related items for PubMed ID: 29212395

  • 1. Prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates using MR imaging: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound.
    Carlin A, Kadji C, De Angelis R, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1673-1681. PubMed ID: 29212395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C, Bevilacqua E, Hurtado I, Carlin A, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dütemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 30779239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A, Anthoulakis C, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30912210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women.
    Martín-Palumbo G, Atanasova VB, Rego Tejeda MT, Antolín Alvarado E, Bartha JL.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6721-6726. PubMed ID: 34024243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Stephens K, Al-Memar M, Beattie-Jones S, Dhanjal M, Mappouridou S, Thorne E, Lees C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.
    Price CR, Roeckner J, Odibo L, Odibo A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Repeatability of estimated fetal weight: Comparison between MR imaging versus 2D ultrasound in at- and near-term patients.
    Kadji C, Camus MF, Bevilacqua E, Cannie MM, Sanchez TC, Jani JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():35-40. PubMed ID: 28629568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight.
    Sirico A, Diemert A, Glosemeyer P, Hecher K.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 51(3):381-386. PubMed ID: 28294442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort?
    Flatley C, Kumar S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jul; 32(14):2380-2386. PubMed ID: 29455616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of Neonatal Growth Restriction in Fetuses With Gastroschisis by Early Third Trimester Ultrasonography Utilizing Contemporary Birth Weight Percentiles.
    McKenna M, McKenna D, Zhou M, Sonek J, Wiegand S.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 May; 42(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 36177800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Tarca AL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Ahn H, Garcia M, Xu Z, Korzeniewski SJ, Saker H, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Romero R.
    PLoS One; 2016 May; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.