These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


206 related items for PubMed ID: 29212433

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
    Denys S, Hofmann M, Luts H, Guérin C, Keymeulen A, Van Hoeck K, van Wieringen A, Hoppenbrouwers K, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P, Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Velappan K, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Nov; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone.
    Smits C, Kapteyn TS, Houtgast T.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 14974624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of expansion algorithms on speech reception thresholds.
    Wise CL, Zakis JA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 18669128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hearing threshold levels and speech recognition in noise in 7-year-olds.
    Blandy S, Lutman M.
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):435-43. PubMed ID: 16149238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C, Theo Goverts S, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
    George EL, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2362-75. PubMed ID: 17471748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.