These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
178 related items for PubMed ID: 29218613
1. Can We Perform CT of the Appendix with Less Than 1 mSv? A De-escalating Dose-simulation Study. Park JH, Jeon JJ, Lee SS, Dhanantwari AC, Sim JY, Kim HY, Lee KH. Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1826-1834. PubMed ID: 29218613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in diagnosing appendicitis at 2-mSv CT. Park JH, Kim B, Kim MS, Kim HJ, Ko Y, Ahn S, Karul M, Fletcher JG, Lee KH. Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1227-36. PubMed ID: 27315093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K, Kim TY, Lee HS, Hwang SS, Song KJ, Kang HS, Kim YH, Rhee JE. Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21633052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose (2-mSv) computed tomography for suspected appendicitis: Applicability in an emergency department. Woo JH, Jeon JJ, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Jang YS, Lim YS, Shim YS, Ahn SJ, Park JH, Lee SS. Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2139-2143. PubMed ID: 29571828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Appendiceal Visualization on 2-mSv CT vs. Conventional-Dose CT in Adolescents and Young Adults with Suspected Appendicitis: An Analysis of Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial Data. Cho J, Kim Y, Lee S, Min HD, Ko Y, Chee CG, Kim HY, Park JH, Lee KH, LOCAT Group. Korean J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 23(4):413-425. PubMed ID: 35289144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 2-mSv CT vs. conventional-dose CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: post hoc subgroup analysis of the LOCAT data. Ko Y, Lee WJ, Park JH, Kim HY, Sim JY, Tannaphai P, Lee KH, for LOCAT Group. Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4573-4585. PubMed ID: 32240354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. Seo H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Kim K, Kang SB, Kim SY, Kim YH. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-Dose (2-mSv) CT in Adolescents and Young Adults With Suspected Appendicitis: Advantages of Additional Review of Thin Sections Using Multiplanar Sliding-Slab Averaging Technique. Lee YJ, Kim B, Ko Y, Cho KE, Hong SS, Kim DH, Song H, Lee KH. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):W485-91. PubMed ID: 26496570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance. Kim SH, Yoon JH, Lee JH, Lim YJ, Kim OH, Ryu JH, Son JH. Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):899-907. PubMed ID: 25118330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging. Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Chen OT, Li K, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ. Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2055-2066. PubMed ID: 27595834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Emergency assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain using low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: a comparative study. Poletti PA, Becker M, Becker CD, Halfon Poletti A, Rutschmann OT, Zaidi H, Perneger T, Platon A. Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3300-3309. PubMed ID: 28083698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial Performance of Radiologists and Radiology Residents in Interpreting Low-Dose (2-mSv) Appendiceal CT. Yang HK, Ko Y, Lee MH, Woo H, Ahn S, Kim B, Pickhardt PJ, Kim MS, Park SB, Lee KH, Low-Dose CT for Appendicitis Trial (LOCAT) Group. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):W594-611. PubMed ID: 26587949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT. Othman AE, Bongers MN, Zinsser D, Schabel C, Wichmann JL, Arshid R, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Bamberg F. Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 28406049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Iterative reconstructions versus filtered back-projection for urinary stone detection in low-dose CT. Winklehner A, Blume I, Winklhofer S, Eberli D, Gnannt R, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H. Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24119356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unenhanced computed tomography for normal appendix detection: comparison of low-dose with statistical iterative reconstruction and regular-dose with filtered back projection. Park HR, Park SB, Lee ES, Park HJ, Lee JB, Kim YS. Clin Imaging; 2017 Nov; 43():117-121. PubMed ID: 28282598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study. Khawaja RD, Singh S, Lira D, Bippus R, Do S, Padole A, Pourjabbar S, Koehler T, Shepard JA, Kalra MK. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014 Nov; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance and image quality of an image-based denoising algorithm applied to radiation dose-reduced CT in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Choi HU, Cho J, Hwang J, Lee S, Chang W, Park JH, Lee KH. Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Jun; 49(6):1839-1849. PubMed ID: 38411690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]