These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

540 related items for PubMed ID: 29221708

  • 21. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses.
    Varikooty J, Schulze MM, Dumbleton K, Keir N, Woods CA, Fonn D, Jones LW.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 25628269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Corneal, Conjunctival effects and blood flow changes related to silicone hydrogel lens wear and their correlations with end of day comfort.
    Sorbara L, Maram J, Simpson T, Hutchings N.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 29233456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Corneo-scleral limbal changes following short-term soft contact lens wear.
    Consejo A, Bartuzel MM, Iskander DR.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 28550975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Daily Wear Contact Lenses Manufactured in Etafilcon A Are Noninferior to Two Silicone Hydrogel Lens Types With Respect to Hypoxic Stress.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB, Debanne S, Benetz BA, Wilson T, Brennan N.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 27768615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J, Young G, Hunt C, Henderson T.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial.
    Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 16276320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ, Musch DC.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N, Efron S.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of Silicone Hydrogel and Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Diec J, Tilia D, Thomas V.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S167-S172. PubMed ID: 28099285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS, Mroczkowska S, Hunt OA, Bilkhu P, Drew T, Sheppard A.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.