These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

449 related items for PubMed ID: 29248201

  • 1. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F, Musumeci G, Navarra R, Di Lazzaro V, Caulo M, Uncini A.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
    Zappasodi F, Musumeci G, Navarra R, Di Lazzaro V, Caulo M, Uncini A.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD.
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC.
    Brain Stimul; 2014 Sep; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE, Caglayan HB, Cengiz B.
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: A pilot study.
    Wang H, Wang X, Jin J, Zhang W, Li Y, Liu Z, Yin T.
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb 16; 694():46-50. PubMed ID: 30342993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.
    J Physiol; 2017 Feb 15; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
    Chew T, Ho KA, Loo CK.
    Brain Stimul; 2015 Feb 15; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex.
    Mosayebi Samani M, Agboada D, Jamil A, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.
    Cortex; 2019 Oct 15; 119():350-361. PubMed ID: 31195316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
    Strube W, Bunse T, Nitsche MA, Nikolaeva A, Palm U, Padberg F, Falkai P, Hasan A.
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug 15; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.
    Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.
    J Physiol; 2013 Apr 01; 591(7):1987-2000. PubMed ID: 23339180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B, Antal A, Rothkegel H, Paulus W.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014 Apr 01; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.
    Kwon TG, Park E, Kang C, Chang WH, Kim YH.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 Nov 22; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 27689549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
    López-Alonso V, Fernández-Del-Olmo M, Costantini A, Gonzalez-Henriquez JJ, Cheeran B.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Dec 22; 126(12):2342-7. PubMed ID: 25922127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of prolonged cathodal direct current stimulation on the excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex.
    Di Lazzaro V, Manganelli F, Dileone M, Notturno F, Esposito M, Capasso M, Dubbioso R, Pace M, Ranieri F, Minicuci G, Santoro L, Uncini A.
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2012 Dec 22; 119(12):1499-506. PubMed ID: 22711234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.