These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The reliability of single-field fundus photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: the Central Australian Ocular Health Study. Ku JJ, Landers J, Henderson T, Craig JE. Med J Aust; 2013 Feb 04; 198(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 23373499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Suansilpong A, Rawdaree P. J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep 04; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy by Using Digital Fundus Photographs in the Peripheral Health Facilities of Bangladesh: Validation Study. Begum T, Rahman A, Nomani D, Mamun A, Adams A, Islam S, Khair Z, Khair Z, Anwar I. JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Mar 09; 7(3):e23538. PubMed ID: 33411671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography. Aptel F, Denis P, Rouberol F, Thivolet C. Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun 09; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Ruamviboonsuk P, Teerasuwanajak K, Tiensuwan M, Yuttitham K, Thai Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. Ophthalmology; 2006 May 09; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep 09; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, Pilotto E, Varano M, Cavarzeran F, Avogaro A, Midena E. Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul 09; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Leese GP. Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul 09; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [A new grading system from color fundus photographs for screening for diabetic retinopathy]. Lecleire-Collet A, Erginay A, Angioi-Duprez K, Deb-Joardar N, Gain P, Massin P. J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Sep 09; 30(7):674-87. PubMed ID: 17878820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is one 60 degrees fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Møller F, Hansen M, Sjølie AK. Diabetes Care; 2001 Dec 09; 24(12):2083-5. PubMed ID: 11723087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]