These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Feng T, Wang X, Jin Z, Qin X, Sun C, Qi B, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Wei X. Front Public Health; 2023 Jun 19; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review. Buczinski S, Ferraro S, Vandeweerd JM. Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec 01; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS. Hooper EJ, Pandis N, Cobourne MT, Seehra J. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct 04; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery. Javidan A, Alaichi J, Nassar Y, Li A, Balta KY, Naji F. J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec 04; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR. Dosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Vucic K, Markovina N, Pieper D, Puljak L. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May 08; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors associated with the reporting quality of low back pain systematic review abstracts in physical therapy: a methodological study. Nascimento DP, Gonzalez GZ, Araujo AC, Moseley A, Maher C, Costa LOP. Braz J Phys Ther; 2021 May 08; 25(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 33246869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality. Sharma S, Oremus M. J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul 08; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement. Lee SY, Sagoo H, Farwana R, Whitehurst K, Fowler A, Agha R. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec 28; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol. Ruano J, Gómez-García F, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Fernández-Rueda JL, Fernández-Chaichio J, Alcalde-Mellado P, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Viguera-Guerra I, Franco-García F, Cárdenas-Aranzana M, Romero JLH, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Isla-Tejera B, Garcia-Nieto AV. Syst Rev; 2018 Mar 09; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews. Zhong D, Xiao Q, Xiao X, Li Y, Ye J, Xia L, Zhang C, Li J, Zheng H, Jin R. Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov 09; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM, Liu J, Huda F, Atieh M. J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr 09; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Shrier I, Thombs BD. BMJ Open; 2016 Nov 18; 6(11):e012867. PubMed ID: 27864250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]