These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


189 related items for PubMed ID: 29284958

  • 41. Chemomechanical caries removal in children: efficacy and efficiency.
    Peters MC, Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ, Inglehart MR.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Dec; 137(12):1658-66; quiz 1729-30. PubMed ID: 17138710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.
    Maru VP, Shakuntala BS, Nagarathna C.
    Open Dent J; 2015 Dec; 9():462-72. PubMed ID: 26962375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study.
    Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Dec; 28(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20660971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of Carisolv and Polymer Bur for Selective Caries Removal in Primary Molars.
    Asal MA, Abdellatif AM, Hammouda HE.
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Dec; 14(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 34720507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Chemomechanical caries removal--a clinical evaluation.
    Zinck JH, McInnes-Ledoux P, Capdeboscq C, Weinberg R.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Jan; 15(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 3162257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Biochemical characterisation of carious dentine zones using Raman spectroscopy.
    Alturki M, Koller G, Warburton F, Almhöjd U, Banerjee A.
    J Dent; 2021 Feb; 105():103558. PubMed ID: 33309806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal.
    Yazici AR, Atílla P, Ozgünaltay G, Müftüoglu S.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1177-82. PubMed ID: 14641660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal.
    Toledano M, Ghinea R, Cardona JC, Cabello I, Yamauti M, Pérez MM, Osorio R.
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e31-8. PubMed ID: 23507398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L, Waltimo T, Stich H, Lussi A.
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods.
    Hamama H, Yiu C, Burrow M.
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):446-56; quiz 525. PubMed ID: 25131424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.