These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 29286181

  • 1. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY, Cader FN, Abduo J, Palamara J.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study.
    Khan SA, Singh S, Neyaz N, Jaiswal MM, Tanwar AS, Singh A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb 01; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA, de Avila ÉD, Amaral ÂL, Pinelli LA, de Assis Mollo F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Aug 01; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An in vitro study.
    Kaur T, Singla S, Kumar L.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 Aug 01; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Aug 01; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr 01; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Apr 01; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants.
    Tsagkalidis G, Tortopidis D, Mpikos P, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct 01; 114(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 26213265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.