These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

382 related items for PubMed ID: 29289989

  • 1. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Kim SM, Baek JM, Song JY, Lee SJ, Park EK, Kim CJ, Lee YS.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Mar; 297(3):691-697. PubMed ID: 29289989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Karacan T, Ozyurek E, Usta T, Odacilar E, Hanli U, Kovalak E, Dayan H.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 38(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29577776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Barbed suture in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bogliolo S, Musacchi V, Dominoni M, Cassani C, Gaggero CR, De Silvestri A, Gardella B, Spinillo A.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 25700658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy.
    Uccella S, Malzoni M, Cromi A, Seracchioli R, Ciravolo G, Fanfani F, Shakir F, Gueli Alletti S, Legge F, Berretta R, Corrado G, Casarella L, Donarini P, Zanello M, Perrone E, Gisone B, Vizza E, Scambia G, Ghezzi F.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):500.e1-500.e13. PubMed ID: 29410107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Barbed versus conventional 2-layer continuous running sutures for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
    Kim JH, Byun SW, Song JY, Kim YH, Lee HJ, Park TC, Lee KH, Hur SY, Park JS, Lee SJ.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(39):e4981. PubMed ID: 27684850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.
    Cong L, Li C, Wei B, Zhan L, Wang W, Xu Y.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():18-22. PubMed ID: 27816737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Medina BC, Giraldo CH, Riaño G, Hoyos LR, Otalora C.
    JSLS; 2014 Dec; 18(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24680149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Vaginal cuff closure with absorbable bidirectional barbed suture during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Bogliolo S, Nadalini C, Iacobone AD, Musacchi V, Carus AP.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):219-21. PubMed ID: 23820139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
    Einarsson JI, Cohen SL, Gobern JM, Sandberg EM, Hill-Lydecker CI, Wang K, Brown DN.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 20(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 23680517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the vaginal cuff with barbed sutures in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Yildirim D, Ozyurek SE, Kiyak H, Han A, Koroglu N, Bestel A, Topbas F.
    Ginekol Pol; 2018 Sep; 89(5):229-234. PubMed ID: 30084473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Unidirectional barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure without backward stitch in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Misirlioglu S, Boza A, Arslan T, Urman B, Taskiran C.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1793-1799. PubMed ID: 30019797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Morgan-Ortiz F, Contreras-Soto JO, Soto-Pineda JM, Zepeda MA, Peraza-Garay FJ.
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():143-8. PubMed ID: 23860935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Retrospective Review of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence: Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures.
    MacKoul P, Danilyants N, Sarfoh V, van der Does L, Kazi N.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 30853572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study.
    Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV, Mendivil AA, Lopez KL, Goldstein BH.
    Int J Surg; 2015 Jul; 19():27-30. PubMed ID: 25980394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy.
    Neubauer NL, Schink PJ, Pant A, Singh D, Lurain JR, Schink JC.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 23040405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Uccella S, Zorzato PC, Kho RM.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures.
    Nawfal AK, Eisenstein D, Theoharis E, Dahlman M, Wegienka G.
    JSLS; 2012 Mar; 16(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 23484558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.