These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
500 related items for PubMed ID: 29301646
21. Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial. Sciahbasi A, Frigoli E, Sarandrea A, Rothenbühler M, Calabrò P, Lupi A, Tomassini F, Cortese B, Rigattieri S, Cerrato E, Zavalloni D, Zingarelli A, Calabria P, Rubartelli P, Sardella G, Tebaldi M, Windecker S, Jüni P, Heg D, Valgimigli M. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May 23; 69(20):2530-2537. PubMed ID: 28330794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bajaj A, Pancholy S, Sothwal A, Nawaz Y, Boruah P. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep 23; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul 25; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program. Valgimigli M, MATRIX investigators. Am Heart J; 2014 Dec 25; 168(6):838-45.e6. PubMed ID: 25458646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brener MI, Bush A, Miller JM, Hasan RK. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec 01; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice. Barbash IM, Minha S, Gallino R, Lager R, Badr S, Loh JP, Kitabata H, Pendyala LK, Torguson R, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun 01; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions. Koifman E, Gaglia MA, Escarcega RO, Bernardo NL, Lager RA, Gallino RA, Ben-Dor I, Pichard AD, Baker NC, Lipinski MJ, Kiramijyan S, Negi SI, Torguson R, Gai J, Suddath WO, Satler LF, Waksman R. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar 01; 89(4):640-646. PubMed ID: 27860277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Bhatia G, Routledge H, De Belder M, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan 01; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR, RIVAL trial group. Lancet; 2011 Apr 23; 377(9775):1409-20. PubMed ID: 21470671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]