These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 29307048

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology.
    Chen CS, Shih SL.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Aug; 56(8):1333-1341. PubMed ID: 29307048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
    Lee CH, Kim YE, Lee HJ, Kim DG, Kim CH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.
    Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Kang KT, Moon SH, Kim HS, Park JO, Moon ES, Kim BR, Sohn JS, Ko YN, Lee HM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep 01; 37(19):1637-44. PubMed ID: 22089393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
    Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011 Sep 01; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
    Shen H, Fogel GR, Zhu J, Liao Z, Liu W.
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul 01; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
    Kulduk A, Altun NS, Senkoylu A.
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec 01; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
    Zhu ZQ, Duan S, Wang KF, Liu HY, Xu S, Liu CJ.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul 01; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.