These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

339 related items for PubMed ID: 29331951

  • 1. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M, Johnson CA, Zamba KD.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Artes PH, Chauhan BC.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, Singh K, Lee DA, Dueker DK, Fechtner RD, Juzych MS, Lin SC, Netland PA, Pastor SA, Schuman JS, Samples JR, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee 2001-2002 Glaucoma Panel.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep 21; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May 02; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 02; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul 02; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb 02; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec 02; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May 02; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM, Kong YXG, Mehta A, He M, Crowston JG, Gupta V, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun 02; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 02; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.
    Hirasawa K, Shoji N, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shimizu K.
    Sci Rep; 2016 May 05; 6():25563. PubMed ID: 27149561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.
    Fredette MJ, Giguère A, Anderson DR, Budenz DL, McSoley J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May 05; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF, Cubbidge RP, Al-Mansouri F, Bener A.
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb 05; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun 05; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.
    Allen CS, Sponsel WE, Trigo Y, Dirks MS, Flynn WJ.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb 05; 30(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11885802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V, Kong GXY, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May 01; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.