These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1037 related items for PubMed ID: 29332447

  • 1. A Projection Quality-Driven Tube Current Modulation Method in Cone-Beam CT for IGRT: Proof of Concept.
    Men K, Dai J.
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 29332447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Men K, Dai J, Chen X, Li M, Zhang K, Huang P.
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images.
    Niu T, Sun M, Star-Lack J, Gao H, Fan Q, Zhu L.
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5395-406. PubMed ID: 21089775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Investigation of the radiation dose from cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy: A comparison of methodologies.
    Buckley JG, Wilkinson D, Malaroda A, Metcalfe P.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 29265684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
    Chang J, Zhou L, Wang S, Clifford Chao KS.
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
    Miura H, Ozawa S, Okazue T, Kawakubo A, Yamada K, Nagata Y.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experimental evaluation of actual delivered dose using mega-voltage cone-beam CT and direct point dose measurement.
    Matsubara K, Kohno R, Nishioka S, Shibuya T, Ariji T, Akimoto T, Saitoh H.
    Med Dosim; 2013 May; 38(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23266165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimizing the target detectability of cone beam CT performed in image-guided radiation therapy for patients of different body sizes.
    Yang CC, Yu PC, Ruan JM, Chen YC.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):310-317. PubMed ID: 29516610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of Ultra-low-dose Paediatric Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Image-guided Radiotherapy.
    Bryce-Atkinson A, de Jong R, Bel A, Aznar MC, Whitfield G, van Herk M.
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2020 Dec; 32(12):835-844. PubMed ID: 33067079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.