These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


293 related items for PubMed ID: 29372512

  • 1. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M, Clarys D, Spatola N, Ferrand L.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
    Burca M, Chausse P, Ferrand L, Parris BA, Augustinova M.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M, Silvert L, Spatola N, Ferrand L.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
    Burca M, Beaucousin V, Chausse P, Ferrand L, Parris BA, Augustinova M.
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time.
    Martinon LM, Ferrand L, Burca M, Hasshim N, Lakhzoum D, Parris BA, Silvert L, Augustinova M.
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Aug; 52(6):1229-1245. PubMed ID: 38467923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components.
    Ferrand L, Ducrot S, Chausse P, Maïonchi-Pino N, O'Connor RJ, Parris BA, Perret P, Riggs KJ, Augustinova M.
    Dev Sci; 2020 Mar; 23(2):e12899. PubMed ID: 31483912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
    Morey CC, Elliott EM, Wiggers J, Eaves SD, Shelton JT, Mall JT.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A, Abdel Rahman R, Stürmer B, Sommer W.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.
    Itthipuripat S, Deering S, Serences JT.
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Dec 17; 29(12):5037-5048. PubMed ID: 30877786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V, Roelofs A, van der Meij R.
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr 23; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
    Scaltritti M, Job R, Sulpizio S.
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul 23; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.
    Chen Z, Lei X, Ding C, Li H, Chen A.
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb 01; 66():577-84. PubMed ID: 23103691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation.
    Sulpizio S, Spinelli G, Scaltritti M.
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Aug 01; 52(6):1422-1438. PubMed ID: 38530621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
    Hasshim N, Downes M, Bate S, Parris BA.
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May 01; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
    Augustinova M, Silvert L, Ferrand L, Llorca PM, Flaudias V.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr 01; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults.
    Aly M, Kojima H.
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec 01; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R, Henik A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct 01; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S, Mills L, Norris D.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov 01; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.