These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1227 related items for PubMed ID: 29374658
1. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia. Canfell K, Saville M, Caruana M, Gebski V, Darlington-Brown J, Brotherton J, Heley S, Castle PE. BMJ Open; 2018 Jan 26; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study. Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC, Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM. Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep 26; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT. Gilham C, Sargent A, Kitchener HC, Peto J. Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun 26; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary cervical cancer screening with HPV testing compared with liquid-based cytology: results of round 1 of a randomised controlled trial -- the HPV FOCAL Study. Ogilvie GS, Krajden M, van Niekerk DJ, Martin RE, Ehlen TG, Ceballos K, Smith LW, Kan L, Cook DA, Peacock S, Stuart GC, Franco EL, Coldman AJ. Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec 04; 107(12):1917-24. PubMed ID: 23169286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia. Simms KT, Hall M, Smith MA, Lew JB, Hughes S, Yuill S, Hammond I, Saville M, Canfell K. PLoS One; 2017 Dec 04; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Ogilvie GS, van Niekerk D, Krajden M, Smith LW, Cook D, Gondara L, Ceballos K, Quinlan D, Lee M, Martin RE, Gentile L, Peacock S, Stuart GCE, Franco EL, Coldman AJ. JAMA; 2018 Jul 03; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening. Tay SK, Lin LE, Goh RC. Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul 03; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women. Aoyama-Kikawa S, Fujita H, Hanley SJB, Kasamo M, Kikuchi K, Torigoe T, Matsuno Y, Tamakoshi A, Sasaki T, Matsuura M, Kato Y, Dong P, Watari H, Saito T, Sengoku K, Sakuragi N. Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun 03; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program. Lew JB, Simms KT, Smith MA, Hall M, Kang YJ, Xu XM, Caruana M, Velentzis LS, Bessell T, Saville M, Hammond I, Canfell K. Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb 15; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting. Poljak M, Oštrbenk A, Seme K, Šterbenc A, Jančar N, Vrtačnik Bokal E. J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar 15; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples. Song F, Du H, Wang C, Huang X, Wu R, CHIMUST team. PLoS One; 2020 Mar 15; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study. Gori S, Battagello J, Gustinucci D, Campari C, Zorzi M, Frayle H, Passamonti B, Sartori G, Bulletti S, Fodero C, Cesarini E, Faggiano R, Del Mistro A. BJOG; 2021 Jul 15; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial. Wright TC, Behrens CM, Ranger-Moore J, Rehm S, Sharma A, Stoler MH, Ridder R. Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan 15; 144(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 28094038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]