These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 29391171

  • 1. Approximate Bayesian computation reveals the importance of repeated measurements for parameterising cell-based models of growing tissues.
    Kursawe J, Baker RE, Fletcher AG.
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr 14; 443():66-81. PubMed ID: 29391171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates for stochastic models of collective cell spreading using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Vo BN, Drovandi CC, Pettitt AN, Simpson MJ.
    Math Biosci; 2015 May 14; 263():133-42. PubMed ID: 25747415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Quantitative modelling of epithelial morphogenesis: integrating cell mechanics and molecular dynamics.
    Yu JC, Fernandez-Gonzalez R.
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2017 Jul 14; 67():153-160. PubMed ID: 27481581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.
    Fletcher AG, Cooper F, Baker RE.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 May 19; 372(1720):. PubMed ID: 28348253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bayesian inference of force dynamics during morphogenesis.
    Ishihara S, Sugimura K.
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Nov 21; 313():201-11. PubMed ID: 22939902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reverse engineering morphogenesis through Bayesian optimization of physics-based models.
    Kumar N, Mim MS, Dowling A, Zartman JJ.
    NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2024 May 07; 10(1):49. PubMed ID: 38714708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Parameter Inference for Computational Cognitive Models with Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Kangasrääsiö A, Jokinen JPP, Oulasvirta A, Howes A, Kaski S.
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun 07; 43(6):e12738. PubMed ID: 31204797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Geometric constraints alter cell arrangements within curved epithelial tissues.
    Rupprecht JF, Ong KH, Yin J, Huang A, Dinh HH, Singh AP, Zhang S, Yu W, Saunders TE.
    Mol Biol Cell; 2017 Dec 01; 28(25):3582-3594. PubMed ID: 28978739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Discrete Mesh Approach in Morphogenesis Modelling: the Example of Gastrulation.
    Demongeot J, Lontos A, Promayon E.
    Acta Biotheor; 2016 Dec 01; 64(4):427-446. PubMed ID: 27853896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Capabilities and Limitations of Tissue Size Control through Passive Mechanical Forces.
    Kursawe J, Brodskiy PA, Zartman JJ, Baker RE, Fletcher AG.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec 01; 11(12):e1004679. PubMed ID: 26713738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Experimental validation of force inference in epithelia from cell to tissue scale.
    Kong W, Loison O, Chavadimane Shivakumar P, Chan EH, Saadaoui M, Collinet C, Lenne PF, Clément R.
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct 10; 9(1):14647. PubMed ID: 31601854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The same but different: cell intercalation as a driver of tissue deformation and fluidity.
    Tetley RJ, Mao Y.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Sep 24; 373(1759):. PubMed ID: 30249777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Using a continuum model to decipher the mechanics of embryonic tissue spreading from time-lapse image sequences: An approximate Bayesian computation approach.
    Stepien TL, Lynch HE, Yancey SX, Dempsey L, Davidson LA.
    PLoS One; 2019 Sep 24; 14(6):e0218021. PubMed ID: 31246967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis.
    Rauzi M, Verant P, Lecuit T, Lenne PF.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2008 Dec 24; 10(12):1401-10. PubMed ID: 18978783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Toward high-content/high-throughput imaging and analysis of embryonic morphogenesis.
    Truong TV, Supatto W.
    Genesis; 2011 Jul 24; 49(7):555-69. PubMed ID: 21504047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laser Ablation to Probe the Epithelial Mechanics in Drosophila.
    Shivakumar PC, Lenne PF.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016 Jul 24; 1478():241-251. PubMed ID: 27730586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Geometry can provide long-range mechanical guidance for embryogenesis.
    Dicko M, Saramito P, Blanchard GB, Lye CM, Sanson B, Étienne J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Mar 24; 13(3):e1005443. PubMed ID: 28346461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models.
    Eriksson O, Jauhiainen A, Maad Sasane S, Kramer A, Nair AG, Sartorius C, Hellgren Kotaleski J.
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan 15; 35(2):284-292. PubMed ID: 30010712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comprehensive model of Drosophila epithelium reveals the role of embryo geometry and cell topology in mechanical responses.
    Cheikh MI, Tchoufag J, Osterfield M, Dean K, Bhaduri S, Zhang C, Mandadapu KK, Doubrovinski K.
    Elife; 2023 Oct 02; 12():. PubMed ID: 37782009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In Vivo Force Application Reveals a Fast Tissue Softening and External Friction Increase during Early Embryogenesis.
    D'Angelo A, Dierkes K, Carolis C, Salbreux G, Solon J.
    Curr Biol; 2019 May 06; 29(9):1564-1571.e6. PubMed ID: 31031116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.