These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 2939545

  • 21. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB, Fontana UF, Teixeira HM, Costa CA.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities.
    Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA.
    J Dent; 1999 Nov; 27(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 10528973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Pulpal reaction to IRM cement: an intermediate restorative material containing eugenol.
    Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Torstenson B.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981 Nov; 48(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 6944322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Pulpal response to a new composite dental restorative material.
    Retief DH, Cleaton-Jones PE, Austin JC.
    J Oral Pathol; 1973 Nov; 2(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 4207554
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Pulpal responses to two luting cements.
    Valcke CF, Cleaton-Jones PE, Austin JC, Forbes M, Sam C.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):858-62. PubMed ID: 6964197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K, Murray PE, About I, Windsor LJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide/eugenol cement.
    Brännström M, Nyborg H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Feb; 35(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 1061813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Pulp reactions to a composite resin.
    Harris R.
    Aust Dent J; 1973 Apr; 18(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 4515704
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Biologic evaluation of filling materials. A comparison of results using cell culture techniques, implantation tests and pulp studies.
    Mjör IA, Hensten-Pettersen A, Skogedal O.
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun 02; 27(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 407166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Reaction of the pulp to a new composite adhesive].
    Inokoshi S, Iwaku M, Fusayawa T.
    Riv Odontostomatol Implantoprotesi; 1983 Jun 02; (5):39-44. PubMed ID: 6230566
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents.
    Demarco FF, Tarquinio SB, Jaeger MM, de Araújo VC, Matson E.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar 02; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12066661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.