These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1723 related items for PubMed ID: 29404729

  • 1. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH, Choi K, Gu S, Cho J, Jang KT, Woo YS, Lee KT, Lee JK, Lee KH.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan 29; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar 29; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug 29; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A, Wadhwa V, Singh H, Khan S, Gupta K, Liang H, Hussain I, Vargo J, Jang S, Chahal P, Bhatt A, Siddiki H, Erim T, Sanaka MR.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May 29; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
    Sweeney J, Soong L, Goyal A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr 29; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 87.