These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
302 related items for PubMed ID: 29420412
1. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries. Fox NS, Melka S, Miller J, Bender S, Silverstein M, Saltzman DH, Rebarber A. Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery. Temming LA, Raghuraman N, Carter EB, Stout MJ, Rampersad RM, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery. Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques. Schrufer-Poland TL, Ruiz MP, Kassar S, Tomassian C, Algren SD, Yeast JD. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure? Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN. Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial. Rodel RL, Gray KM, Quiner TE, Bodea Braescu A, Gerkin R, Perlow JH. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Vogell A, Han C, Sendecki J, Pettker C, Leiby BE, Baxter JK, Sfakianaki A, Berghella V. Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov 14; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Kuroki LM, Mullen MM, Massad LS, Wu N, Liu J, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Hagemann AR, Thaker PH, McCourt CK, Novetsky AP. Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul 14; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Buresch AM, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, Sahasrabudhe N, Sun M, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS, Ngai IM, Garry DJ. Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep 14; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture. Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T. J Perinatol; 2016 Oct 14; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status. Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct 14; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of wound complications after cesarean delivery: is suture closure better? Tierney N, LaCoursiere DY, Hebert S, Kelly TF, Lukacz ES. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug 14; 30(16):1992-1996. PubMed ID: 27801606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Ramsey PS, White AM, Guinn DA, Lu GC, Ramin SM, Davies JK, Neely CL, Newby C, Fonseca L, Case AS, Kaslow RA, Kirby RS, Rouse DJ, Hauth JC. Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May 14; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Han D, Feng L, Xu L, Li C, Zhang Q. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct 14; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing. Ibrahim MI, Moustafa GF, Al-Hamid AS, Hussein MR. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May 14; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Schuster M, Berghella V. Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 01; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of subcutaneous closure in preventing wound complications after cesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision: a randomized clinical trial. Corbacioglu Esmer A, Goksedef PC, Akca A, Akbayir O, Dagdeviren H, Turan GY, Yarsilikal F. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Mar 01; 40(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 24738117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]