These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

641 related items for PubMed ID: 29422767

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J, Yu C, Mukherjee PK, Pearlman E, Ghannoum MA.
    Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):918-26. PubMed ID: 19654521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The impact of cellular debris on Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to silicone hydrogel contact lenses and contact lens storage cases.
    Burnham GW, Cavanagh HD, Robertson DM.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 22138709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Organoselenium Polymer Inhibits Biofilm Formation in Polypropylene Contact Lens Case Material.
    Tran PL, Huynh E, Pham P, Lacky B, Jarvis C, Mosley T, Hamood AN, Hanes R, Reid T.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 26974534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A novel antibiofilm technology for contact lens solutions.
    Farber BF, Hsieh HC, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, Epstein A, Wolff A.
    Ophthalmology; 1995 May; 102(5):831-6. PubMed ID: 7777284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of protein deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.
    Subbaraman LN, Borazjani R, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Jones L, Willcox MD.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):959-66. PubMed ID: 21602733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Disruption of contact lens-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms formed in the presence of neutrophils.
    Robertson DM, Parks QM, Young RL, Kret J, Poch KR, Malcolm KC, Nichols DP, Nichols M, Zhu M, Cavanagh HD, Nick JA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2844-50. PubMed ID: 21245396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Protein deposition and its effect on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.
    Omali NB, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Willcox MD.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 90(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 23645371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin.
    Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, Verran J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 75(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9460783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.
    Dutta D, Cole N, Willcox M.
    Mol Vis; 2012 Jan; 18():14-21. PubMed ID: 22259220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion between cosmetic contact lenses and conventional contact lenses.
    Ji YW, Cho YJ, Lee CH, Hong SH, Chung DY, Kim EK, Lee HK.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25536530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.