These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Hussain ST, Chiribiri A, Morton G, Bettencourt N, Schuster A, Paul M, Perera D, Nagel E. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jul 19; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 27430288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Global Coronary Flow Reserve Measured During Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events. Indorkar R, Kwong RY, Romano S, White BE, Chia RC, Trybula M, Evans K, Shenoy C, Farzaneh-Far A. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug 19; 12(8 Pt 2):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 30409558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Ko BS, Linde JJ, Ihdayhid AR, Norgaard BL, Kofoed KF, Sørgaard M, Adams D, Crossett M, Cameron JD, Seneviratne SK. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov 19; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography. Lee JM, Kim CH, Koo BK, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, Bang JI, Suh M, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Na SH, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Kim HS. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep 19; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, De Winter O, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar 19; 3(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20298990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods. Papanastasiou G, Williams MC, Dweck MR, Alam S, Cooper A, Mirsadraee S, Newby DE, Semple SI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Sep 13; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 27624746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, Crossett M, Troupis J, Harper R, Malaiapan Y, Seneviratne SK. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov 13; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ, Platz U, Schmidtler F, Rose J, Kessel A, Roth P, Antoni D, Schnackenburg B, Helmberger T, Rieber J, Hoffmann E, Leber AW. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec 13; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]