These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 29445870

  • 1. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.
    Carpelan A, Karvonen J, Varpe P, Rantala A, Kaljonen A, Grönroos J, Huhtinen H.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
    Perdawood SK, Lund T.
    Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
    Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Sims A, Kittner T, Puffer E, Zimmer J, Bleyl D, Witzigmann H.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1729-37. PubMed ID: 27631643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.
    Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J, Haglind E.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 24950793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
    Shen Z, Ye Y, Zhang X, Xie Q, Yin M, Yang X, Jiang K, Liang B, Wang S.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
    Prytz M, Angenete E, Bock D, Haglind E.
    Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity.
    Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Mattacheo A, de Campos-Lobato LF, Aleman E, Vailati BB, Gama-Rodrigues J, Perez RO.
    World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2160-2167. PubMed ID: 28265736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].
    Chen Y, Chi P.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar 25; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study.
    Klein M, Fischer A, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG).
    Ann Surg; 2015 May 25; 261(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25211268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) is Not Superior to Abdominoperineal Excision (APE) in the Era of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.
    Ulusoy C, Nikolovski A.
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2022 Nov 01; 43(3):21-27. PubMed ID: 36473043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
    Ortiz H, Ciga MA, Armendariz P, Kreisler E, Codina-Cazador A, Gomez-Barbadillo J, Garcia-Granero E, Roig JV, Biondo S, Spanish Rectal Cancer Project.
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jun 01; 101(7):874-82. PubMed ID: 24817654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Neşşar G, Demirbağ AE, Celep B, Elbir OH, Kayaalp C.
    Ulus Cerrahi Derg; 2016 Jun 01; 32(4):244-247. PubMed ID: 28149119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG, Cheung T, Knight JS, Nichols PH, Pilkington SA, Mirnezami AH.
    Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct 01; 16(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22777690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer].
    Jiang HY, Zhou YB, Zhang DF.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul 01; 16(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 23888442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.