These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


176 related items for PubMed ID: 29451650

  • 21. Force level of small diameter nickel-titanium orthodontic wires ligated with different methods.
    Higa RH, Henriques JFC, Janson G, Matias M, de Freitas KMS, Henriques FP, Francisconi MF.
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 28691142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
    Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Bourauel C.
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S, Teté S, Festa M, Festa F.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Nov; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
    Monteiro MR, Silva LE, Elias CN, Vilella Ode V.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of Teflon coating on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires.
    Farronato G, Maijer R, Carìa MP, Esposito L, Alberzoni D, Cacciatore G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 21478301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
    Leite VV, Lopes MB, Gonini Júnior A, Almeida MR, Moura SK, Almeida RR.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Novel approach for characterizing clinical load application of superelastic orthodontic wires.
    Mayer JT, Lapatki BG, Schmidt F.
    Dent Mater; 2024 Sep; 40(9):1487-1496. PubMed ID: 38969574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A, McCabe JF, Gordon PH.
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7786865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effects of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Using Conventional, Copper-Included, and Epoxy-Coated Nickel-Titanium Archwires on Salivary Nickel Levels: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Khaneh Masjedi M, Niknam O, Haghighat Jahromi N, Javidi P, Rakhshan V.
    Biol Trace Elem Res; 2016 Nov; 174(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27048275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. An in vitro assessment of the influences of different wire materials and bracket systems when correcting dental crowding.
    Nahás-Scocate ACR, Neves MB, de Souza LT, de Cerqueira Kasaz A, Listik E, da Silva HDP, Cattaneo PM, Scocate MC, Bordin D, Matias M.
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 Nov 07; 31(11):108. PubMed ID: 33159594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Ex vivo surface and mechanical properties of coated orthodontic archwires.
    Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec 07; 30(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 19011166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
    Galvão MB, Camporesi M, Tortamano A, Dominguez GC, Defraia E.
    Prog Orthod; 2013 May 23; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24325886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparative study of frictional resistance during simulated canine retraction on typodont model.
    Sukh R, Singh GK, Tandon P, Singh GP, Singh A.
    J Orthod Sci; 2013 Apr 23; 2(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24987644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
    Reimann S, Bourauel C, Weber A, Dirk C, Lietz T.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul 23; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Higa RH, Semenara NT, Henriques JF, Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes TM.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jul 23; 21(6):91-97. PubMed ID: 28125144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Campelo RGC, Fahd CG, Ferreira MC, Fialho MPN, Gurgel JA.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Jul 23; 24(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30916250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Coated nickel titanium archwires and their uncoated counterparts: In-vitro contemporary comparison of unloading forces.
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, de Araújo Gurgel J, Bramante FS, Pessoa TF, Albertin SA, Fialho MPN, Pinzan A.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun 23; 18(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 32037208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.